Dewey’s argument that social influences are the “great
educator” and that schools are only a secondary agency has implications in all
neighborhoods and families. The
neighborhoods and families students are raised in from birth to kindergarten
will greatly influence a student’s experiences before they enter public
school. The experiences can be excellent
to marginal in different neighborhoods as well as different families. For example, a student in an affluent
community might not have a cohesive family because of the values a family
has. They may be affluent, but the
student is not being raised in a caring, supportive environment. Another example, could be a child being
raised in a low socioeconomic community, but the child has the caring and
support for the student to be successful.
The teachers of the two students
that I have used as examples can make the difference for the child and for the
family.
In each example, the teacher could intervene to
offer support to the child from the affluent home, but is not being shown the
care and support he/she needs to be successful academically as well as socially
at school. The teacher could also
intervene when working with students in low socioeconomic communities to give
families resources of local support agencies that can help the family manage
through the difficult economic times. We
know from Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs Pyramid that if a child’s basic needs of
physiological, safety, and belonging are not met, it will be hard for a student
to master basic skills at school.
Dewey was right, schools are secondary while
social influences are primary. However,
knowing that as an educator will help teachers to meet the needs of all
students.